Subaru Crosstrek vs Mazda CX-30
Which one costs less to own? Both priced at $30,000, 3 years old, with 20% down on a 60-month loan, 12,000 miles a year and US average costs. Only the car's own costs differ.
The short answer
The Subaru Crosstrek costs about $563 less to own over five years than the Mazda CX-30. Mostly because it keeps more of its value.
Check the Crosstrek with your numbers Check the CX-30
Cost to own, side by side
| Crosstrek | CX-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Value kept after 5 years | 67% | 64% |
| Worth after 5 years | $20,100 | $19,200 |
| Fuel or charging per year | $1,303 | $1,303 |
| Insurance per year | $2,100 | $2,100 |
| Repairs and maintenance, 5 years | $4,602 | $4,264 |
| True monthly cost | $903 | $899 |
| 5-year cost after resale | $41,159 | $41,722 |
Which one is worth it at your income?
The highest price that still scores Worth it (70 or more), with the same loan and costs as above.
| Yearly income | Crosstrek | CX-30 |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $10,500 | $11,000 |
| $75,000 | $25,500 | $26,500 |
| $100,000 | $41,000 | $41,500 |
Real prices differ by trim, mileage and condition, and your insurance quote and loan rate matter a lot. Run your own numbers for the exact car you are looking at.
More on each car
Is a Subaru Crosstrek worth it? · Is a Mazda CX-30 worth it?
Figures are estimates from public averages (data as of 2026-10), not quotes or financial advice. Resale from iSeeCars, repair costs from CarEdge. See how we score.